In the case of McEwan v The Commissioner of Taxation [2024] QSC 252 in the Supreme Court of Queensland, the plaintiff, Julie McEwan, sought leave to amend her statement of claim and introduce additional evidence in a complex legal proceeding against the Commissioner of Taxation and other defendants. The issues at hand involved the plaintiff's dissatisfaction with previous rulings which had found her past amendments to be insufficiently explained or relevant. Over a series of submissions and applications, McEwan attempted to introduce various versions of her pleading, causing confusion for the court and opposing parties. Justice Freeburn noted numerous amendments proposed by McEwan either lacked particularity or added irrelevant matters, ultimately denying many of these proposed changes based on their potential to cause prejudice and disrupt case management. The judge reinforced the need for clarity and proper case management, prohibiting McEwan from presenting further evidence without substantiated relevance.
Full text: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/149941