In Peros v Nationwide News Pty Ltd & Ors (No 2) [2024] QSC 83, John Peros challenged the damning implications of his involvement in Shandee Blackburn's death, as portrayed in an episode of a podcast. The core legal issue revolves around the essential defamation law elements, namely the burden of proving serious harm to Peros's reputation and the particulars required to substantiate such a claim. Justice Applegarth directed Peros to elucidate the extent and nature of his reputation before the podcast's publication, specifically addressing whether and to what extent he was reputed to have killed Blackburn. This decision underscores the court's necessity to understand the plaintiff's standing prior to the alleged defamation to fairly assess the claim's merit. The ruling reflects on the intricacies of defamation law, notably after the enactment of s 10A of the Defamation Act 2005 (Qld), which mandates plaintiffs to prove 'serious harm' to their reputation, a stipulation meant to sift through frivolous claims, solidifying the precedent that each defamation case must be meticulously particularized to demonstrate the genuine impact on the plaintiff's reputation.
top of page
bottom of page