In the case of R v Breen [2024] QCA 168, the Court of Appeal in Queensland dismissed an appeal against conviction by Christopher Michael Breen. Breen had been convicted of one count of assault occasioning bodily harm while armed, with the specific incident involving a star picket used as a dangerous instrument. The key issue on appeal was whether the trial judge failed to direct the jury adequately regarding defences such as compulsion, provocation, and honest mistaken belief concerning consent and preventing repetition of insult. The appellant claimed self-defense under s.271 of the Criminal Code; however, the trial judge did not direct on other potential defenses. The Court found that while the trial judge erred by not including direction on compulsion, this did not result in a miscarriage of justice as the jury’s findings effectively addressed the same factual questions pertinent to both self-defense and compulsion. Ultimately, the Court concluded this oversight did not influence the trial's outcome, affirming the original conviction and sentence.
top of page
bottom of page