In the case of R v Edgerley [2024] QCA 57, David Charles Edgerley appealed against his conviction for murder, arguing that a miscarriage of justice occurred due to the admission of evidence regarding the association between methamphetamine use and aggression, which was used to determine his intent to commit murder. The evidence presented during the trial highlighted Edgerley's methamphetamine intoxication at the time he set the victim on fire, leading to the victim's death. The defense argued that Edgerley's intoxicated state and resulting agitation, aggression, and irrational thoughts, induced by a high dose of methamphetamine, did not constitute intent to kill or cause grievous bodily harm. However, the Supreme Court of Queensland dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that the prosecution, while unable to prove precise consumption details, effectively demonstrated that Edgerley's methamphetamine use played a crucial role in his motive and intent. The Court maintained that the jury's judgment was not unduly influenced by Dr. Duncan's generalized evidence on drug effects but rather on Edgerley's specific actions and intentions, supported by his self-reported drug use and behaviour post-offence.
top of page
bottom of page