In the case of R v HMA [2024] QCA 156, the Court of Appeal examined the appeal brought forth by the appellant against a conviction for a serious criminal offense. The appellant contested that there were significant errors made during the trial process, particularly concerning the admissibility of certain evidence and the adequacy of the jury instructions regarding the standard of proof. The appellate court scrutinized these points and concluded that the trial judge had indeed erred in their rulings, which could have adversely affected the jury's decision-making process. Consequently, the court quashed the conviction and ordered a new trial.
top of page
bottom of page