In R v JAK [2024] QCA 146, the Queensland Court of Appeal dismissed the appellant's appeal against convictions for maintaining a sexual relationship with a child, two counts of rape, and one count of indecent treatment of a child under 16, all offenses categorised as domestic violence incidents. The appellant argued that a miscarriage of justice occurred due to the trial judge's failure to direct the jury on the implications of the appellant's potentially false explanation for recording a video of the complainant. The court found that the trial judge’s instructions sufficiently informed the jury of how to assess the relevance of the appellant's admissions and that there was no reasonable risk of jury misunderstanding. As such, the appeal was dismissed, confirming the jury's findings based on credible evidence provided by the complainant and other witnesses. The court concluded that the legal processes adhered to did not result in any practical injustice, affirming the integrity of the prior conviction.
top of page
bottom of page