The Supreme Court of Queensland's decision in R v MCT [2018] QCA 189 illustrates the court's nuanced consideration in sentencing, reflecting a judicial balancing act between the nature of the crimes, the offender's background, and the broader societal expectations for justice and rehabilitation. The appellant, MCT, faced multiple charges, appealing both convictions and the severity of sentences received. The court's refusal to grant leave for appeal against the sentences in both CA No 59 of 2017 and CA No 199 of 2016 underscores the judiciary's stance that the sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive, considering the gravity and nature of the offences.
R v MCT [2018] QCA 189
Updated: Apr 16, 2024